What is cathodic protection?

 In Damage Prevention & Safety

Cathodic protection (CP) is a technique used to control a metal substance’s corrosion in various applications. Some common areas that apply this science are fuel tanks, pier pilings, ships, offshore oil platforms and casings, metal reinforcement bars for concrete structures, and pipelines.

Request a Quote

Cathodic Protection (CP)

cathodic protection (CP) rectifierTo simplify cathodic protection, assume you have a metal pipeline, and you need to protect it against corrosion. We supplement pipelines with CP after being protected with an anti-corrosion system (coating or wrap), such as Trenton Wax Tape, as the primary form of corrosion protection. Otherwise, the cathodic protection required to combat corrosion for an uncoated pipeline is excessive.

The first step in cathodic protection is to take the metal you are trying to protect (pipeline) and turn it into a cathode. A pipe usually is anodic; it contains positively charged particles. By supplying an electric current, the line becomes passive or cathodic. The science reveals that as long as the flow arrives at the cathode (pipeline) faster than oxygen is, then corrosion will be prevented or significantly slowed.
Pipelines commonly use Impressed Current Cathodic Protection (ICCP), which uses a rectifier and anodes buried in the ground. The rectifier (a DC power source) supplies electrons to the system stopping corrosion of the pipeline. Since the anodes do not surrender many electrons, they do not rust much either.

Sometimes it is more economical to use a galvanic anode system. The anodes (Magnesium, Zinc, or Aluminum) are the electron source and are sacrificed and corrode over the steel pipeline.

The video below offers a simple representation of ICCP.

 

 

Recommended Posts
Showing 2 comments
  • Avatar
    Raja Setlur
    Reply

    Hi Susan,
    In your article you have used the phrase “positively charged electrons”. Since our understanding is that electrons are negatively charged particles, you could probably replace the word ‘electrons’ with ‘particles’

  • Susan Bender
    Susan Bender
    Reply

    I think that makes sense. Wouldn’t that be a proton? Thanks for the input.

Leave a Comment

three × 3 =

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons